Tag Archives: viral

#overlyhonestmethods analyzed: tweets about replication

Screen Shot 2013-01-10 at 11.47.18 PMI’m collecting #overlyhonestmethods tweets about reproducibility and replication. For me, those two terms describe the same issue. Whenever data were manipulated, and files or code are not available online, we can’t check the results. They are not replicable or reproducible. Below are the tweets about replication. The main themes seem to be that authors don’t want others to replicate (and check) their work; that some studies are simply not replicable; and that the community does not value replication enough (or fund it properly).
Continue reading

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , ,

#overlyhonestmethods analyzed: tweets about reproducibility

Screen Shot 2013-01-10 at 11.44.00 PMSince the hash tag #overlyhonestmethods went viral, I have been checking tweets for reproducibility and replication issues. Many tweets are in some way connected: every time a researcher admits being ‘creative’ about getting significant results or slightly ‘polishing’ tables and figures, it will be harder to check or replicate their results. Some tweets, however, directly refer reproducible results. Here they are:
Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,