Category Archives: reproducible research

What has reproducibility promotion done for me?

twitter reproducibility data champion janz
Why should I promote reproducibility? Doesn’t this distract me from my research? Here are four tangible benefits that show how being a data champion has helped my academic career.
Continue reading

Advertisements
Tagged

Hi-tech against scientific misconduct + gender bias

The Guardian published a long read piece today on attempts to detect data errors or fabrication on a large scale. Using the app Statcheck by Michele Nuijten, we can now detect automatically if papers may have errors in them. Unfortunately Michele is hardly mentioned in the article and does not become a vital part of the larger story. Gender bias?

Continue reading

Tagged , , ,

Towards a more comprehensive replication standard in political science: reproducible data collection

How can we create reliable and replicable political science data? A recent article in the American Political Science Review focuses on text analysis and suggests ways to make these data sound and reproducible.

Continue reading

“People like stories” A short film about reproducibility

janz replication spiegelhalterWe need mathematical help to tell the difference between a real discovery and the illusion of one. Fellow of the Royal Society and future President of the Royal Statistical Society, Sir David Spiegelhalter visits Dr Nicole Janz  to discuss reproducibility in scientific publications. Here’s the film:

Continue reading

Reblog: Is withholding your data simply bad science, or should it fall under scientific misconduct?

Screen Shot 2015-07-08 at 20.46.08On the LSE Impact Blog, I argue that if you don’t share your data, you are breaking professional standards in research, and are thus committing scientific misconduct.
Continue reading

Journal introduces replication pre-check

Many political journals have no replication policy, or only implement it half-heartedly. Now a leading journal introduces innovative guidelines for authors that include a verification of the analysis before publication.
Continue reading

Guest Post: Research Data Review is Gaining Ground, by L. Peer and A. Green

Data Review ReplicationThis we know: Sharing research data with the goal of advancing science is slowly becoming the norm in many disciplines, and a rich ecosystem has sprung up in recent years to support that effort. Yes, technological and cultural challenges remain, but anyone watching this space would agree that much progress has been made. A guest post by Limor Peer and Ann Green.

Continue reading

Tagged , , ,